Key result
The newly proposed SD + SV4 ECG criteria had higher sensitivity for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy than Cornell criteria (males: 65.5% vs 55.2%; females: 81.0% vs 56.9%).
Why the study?
Does the newly proposed SD + SV4 electrocardiographic criteria improve diagnostic sensitivity for left ventricular hypertrophy compared to existing criteria in hypertensive patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=235)
No
Does the newly proposed SD + SV4 electrocardiographic criteria improve diagnostic sensitivity for left ventricular hypertrophy compared to existing criteria in hypertensive patients?
The newly proposed SD + SV4 ECG criteria demonstrate improved sensitivity for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients compared to traditional Cornell and Sokolow-Lyon criteria.
May enhance LVH detection sensitivity in hypertension; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
Background The electrocardiographic criteria currently available for the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) are low in sensitivity. Thus, we compared the diagnostic performance of newly proposed electrocardiographic criteria to the existing criteria in a Chinese population. Methods A total of 235 consecutive hypertensive patients, hospitalized in our department between May 2017 and April 2018, were included. They were divided into two groups based on the gold standard echocardiogram: those with ( n = 116) and without LVH ( n = 119). The newly proposed ECG criteria were calculated by summating the amplitude of the deepest S wave (S D ) in any single lead and the S‐wave amplitude of lead V 4 (S V4 ). The area under the curve was calculated and compared against the sex‐specific Cornell limb lead and Sokolow–Lyon criteria. Results ECG analysis of the cohort showed that the newly proposed criteria had the highest sensitivity in diagnosing LVH (male: 65.5%; female: 81%), followed by the Cornell limb lead criteria (male: 55.2%; female: 56.9%). The specificities of both sets of criteria were higher than 70%, with no significant differences between them. Receiver operator curve analysis showed an optimal cutoff of ≥2.1 mV for females (AUC: 0.832; 95% CI: 0.757–0.906) and ≥2.6 mV for males (AUC: 0.772; 95% CI: 0.687–0.856). Conclusion The newly proposed S D + S V4 criteria provide an improved sensitivity for the ECG diagnosis of LVH compared to existing criteria, but its routine use will require further validation in larger populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shao et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension with or without left ventricular hypertrophy (n=235). Newly proposed ECG criteria (SD + SV4) vs. Cornell limb lead and Sokolow-Lyon criteria was evaluated on Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for left ventricular hypertrophy. The newly proposed SD + SV4 ECG criteria had higher sensitivity for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy than Cornell criteria (males: 65.5% vs 55.2%; females: 81.0% vs 56.9%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: