Key result
The ACE DD genotype was significantly associated with an increased risk of acute myocardial infarction compared to ID and II genotypes (OR 4.27; 95% CI 2.65-6.86; p<0.0001).
Why the study?
Is the ACE I/D gene polymorphism associated with an increased risk of acute myocardial infarction in a Tunisian population?
Case-Control (n=357)
Is the ACE I/D gene polymorphism associated with an increased risk of acute myocardial infarction in a Tunisian population?
The ACE DD genotype is associated with higher serum ACE activity and an increased risk of acute myocardial infarction in a Tunisian population.
ACE DD may signal elevated AMI risk in Tunisians; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice yet.
INTRODUCTION: The role of the insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism in the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene (ACE) on acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is controversial. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of the ACE I/D polymorphism on AMI compared with the healthy controls and its relationship with serum ACE activity in a Tunisian population. DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 119 patients with AMI were compared with 238 healthy controls from the same geographical area. ACE genotyping was determined by polymerase chain reaction, and serum ACE activity was measured with N-[3-(2-furylacryloyl]-L-phenylalanyl-L-glycyl-L-glycine as substrate. RESULTS: The ACE I/D polymorphism was significantly different between patients and controls (p < 0.0001). The frequencies of the DD genotype and the D allele were statistically higher in patients with AMI as compared with the controls and were associated with increased risk of AMI (DD vs. ID and II: odds ratio = 4.27, p < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval = 2.65-6.86; D vs. I: odds ratio = 3.15, p < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval = 2.26-4.40). This association was independent of other cardiovascular risk factors but dyslipidemia (p = 0.002) that was not represented in AMI patients with II genotype and in a lower extent with hypertension (p < 0.05). Serum ACE activity was significantly higher in AMI patients with ACE DD genotype compared with the subjects with ID or II genotype (p = 0.034) and was not correlated with other cardiovascular risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: ACE DD genotype associated with higher serum ACE activity is increased in the studied population and might be clinically useful as markers to assess risk for AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mehri et al. (2010) conducted a case-control in Acute myocardial infarction (n=357). ACE DD genotype vs. ACE ID and II genotypes was evaluated on Acute myocardial infarction (OR 4.27, 95% CI 2.65-6.86, p=<0.0001). The ACE DD genotype was significantly associated with an increased risk of acute myocardial infarction compared to ID and II genotypes (OR 4.27; 95% CI 2.65-6.86; p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: