Key result
Psychological measures of anxiety showed no significant correlation with physiological indices of anxiety in patients hospitalized with a first myocardial infarction.
Why the study?
Is there a relationship between psychological and physiological measures of anxiety in patients with a first myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=25)
Is there a relationship between psychological and physiological measures of anxiety in patients with a first myocardial infarction?
Psychological and physiological measures of anxiety do not correlate in patients with a first myocardial infarction, suggesting they assess different aspects of mood.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Anxiety assessment after first MI may require separate psychological and physiological tools; hypothesis-generating for distinct constructs.
The responses of 6 representative physiological parameters frequently assumed to be measures of anxiety along with a set of 4 psychological tests for measuring anxiety were obtained under naturalistic conditions from 25 patients hospitalized with a first myocardial infarction. A canonical correlational analysis failed to show any relationship between anxiety as assessed by the Taylor Manifest Anxiety Scale, Mood Adjective Check List, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and Multiple Affect Adjective Check List psychological tests, and anxiety as assessed by the physiological indices of heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, epinephrine, norepinephrine and VMA. The intercorrelation matrix revealed a significant positive pattern of relationships among all 4 psychological tests, a non-significant, positive pattern of relationships among the physiological indices, and a non-significant, negative pattern of relationships between the psychological and physiological measures. The absence of mood-specific physiological measures for anxiety, as measured by the psychological tests, supports previous theory and investigation and points to the inadvisability of assuming that studies on anxiety that use diverse physiological and psychological measures yield results that may be compared as though they were assessing a common mood.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morrow et al. (1978) conducted an observational in First myocardial infarction (n=25). Psychological tests for anxiety vs. Physiological indices of anxiety was evaluated on Correlation between psychological and physiological measures of anxiety. Psychological measures of anxiety showed no significant correlation with physiological indices of anxiety in patients hospitalized with a first myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: