Key result
Chromogenic anti-Xa assay showed the strongest overall correlation with rivaroxaban concentrations measured by HPLC-MS/MS (r = 0.986, P<0.001), making it the preferred alternative for monitoring.
Why the study?
Monitoring rivaroxaban concentrations is needed for special patients with hepatic insufficiency, high bleeding risk, or high thrombotic risk.
Do routine coagulation indices (anti-Xa, PT, APTT, TEG) correlate with rivaroxaban concentrations measured by HPLC-MS/MS in patients taking rivaroxaban?
Observational (n=104)
Do routine coagulation indices (anti-Xa, PT, APTT, TEG) correlate with rivaroxaban concentrations measured by HPLC-MS/MS in patients taking rivaroxaban?
Effect estimate: r = 0.986
p-value: p=<0.001
Chromogenic anti-Xa assay is the preferred routine test for monitoring both peak and trough rivaroxaban concentrations, showing strong correlation with the gold-standard HPLC-MS/MS.
Assay correlations with rivaroxaban levels in special populations are hypothesis-generating; leaves open validated monitoring strategies.
Background: Rivaroxaban has predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. However, monitoring rivaroxaban concentrations should be provided for special patients with hepatic insufficiency, high bleeding risk, and high thrombotic risk. Objective: This study aimed to correlate chromogenic anti-Xa assay, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thromboelastogram reaction time (TEG R-time), and rivaroxaban concentration measured by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) (MS-Riva). Methods: Peripheral venous blood was collected from recruited patients 30 minutes before and 2 to 4 hours after drug administration. High-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and chromogenic anti-Xa assay measured rivaroxaban concentration. Different assays were compared by Pearson correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: A total of 104 patients with 191 plasma were included in the study. Overall analysis shows that chromogenic anti-Xa assay, PT, APTT, and TEG R-time strongly correlated with MS-Riva ( r = 0.986; r = 0.884; r = 0.741; r = 0.739; P < 0.001). Rivaroxaban peak concentration detected by HPLC-MS/MS (MS-peak) showed a very strong correlation with the chromogenic anti-Xa assay ( r = 0.977, P < 0.001) and moderate correlation with PT, APTT, and TEG R-time ( r = 0.670; r = 0.571; r = 0.481, P < 0.001). Rivaroxaban trough concentration detected by HPLC-MS/MS (MS-trough) correlated strongly with the chromogenic anti-Xa assay ( r = 0.884, P < 0.001), weakly with APTT ( r = 0.313; P = 0.043), and not significantly with PT and TEG R-time ( P = 0.140; P = 0.341). Conclusion and Relevance: High-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry/MS is the preferred choice for monitoring peak and tough concentrations, followed by anti-Xa, while PT is only suitable for peak concentrations. This study can help the clinicians to better adjust the medication regimen and reduce the risk of recurrence of thrombosis as well as the risk of bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Patients receiving rivaroxaban (n=104). Coagulation indices (chromogenic anti-Xa, PT, APTT, TEG R-time) vs. High-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) was evaluated on Correlation with rivaroxaban concentration measured by HPLC-MS/MS (r = 0.986, p=<0.001). Chromogenic anti-Xa assay showed the strongest overall correlation with rivaroxaban concentrations measured by HPLC-MS/MS (r = 0.986, P<0.001), making it the preferred alternative for monitoring.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: