Key result
Alpha blocker use for voiding dysfunction significantly increased the risk of hospitalization for fractures in female patients with chronic kidney disease compared to alpha blockers for hypertension (HR 2.28).
Why the study?
Alpha blockers are frequently prescribed in chronic kidney disease complicated by refractory hypertension, but conclusions regarding the association between their use and fracture risk have not yet been drawn.
Does alpha blocker use increase the risk of fractures in patients with chronic kidney disease?
Cohort (n=115,954)
Yes
Does alpha blocker use increase the risk of fractures in patients with chronic kidney disease?
Hazard Ratio: 2.28 (95% CI 1.01–5.16)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.9% vs 0.7%
p-value: p=0.048
Alpha blockers used for voiding dysfunction, but not for hypertension, are associated with an increased risk of fracture hospitalization in female patients with chronic kidney disease.
May warrant sex-specific caution with alpha blockers in female CKD patients; leaves open causality pending randomized data.
BACKGROUND: Alpha blockers (ABs) are frequently prescribed to patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), which is often complicated by refractory hypertension (HT). Although there have been several reports on the association between AB use and the risk of fractures, their conclusions have not yet been drawn. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the association between AB use and the risk of fractures in patients with CKD. METHOD: This population-based cohort study used patient data obtained between April 2008 and August 2021 from a large-scale Japanese medical claims database. Consecutive patients with CKD who were newly prescribed ABs or non-AB antihypertensive drugs were included; males and females were analysed separately. The AB group was then divided into AB for HT and voiding dysfunction (VD) groups according to the drug approval in Japan. The primary outcome was the first hospitalisation due to fracture, and the variables were evaluated with weighted Cox proportional hazard model using overlap weights. RESULTS: A total of 65,012, 4,723, and 10,958 males constituted the non-AB, AB for HT (doxazosin), and AB for VD (naftopidil, silodosin, tamsulosin, or urapidil) groups, respectively. A total of 31,887, 2,409, and 965 females constituted the non-AB, AB for HT (doxazosin or guanabenz), and AB for VD (urapidil) groups, respectively. In males, hazard ratio (HR) for primary outcome was not increased in the non-AB and AB for VD groups compared with the AB for HT group (HR, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-1.28 and HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.67-2.66, in the non-AB and AB for VD groups, respectively). Whereas, in females, although HR for the primary outcome was not increased in the non-AB group (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.56-1.99), it was significantly increased in the AB for VD group (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.01-5.16) compared with the AB for HT group. CONCLUSION: AB use in patients with CKD did not increase the risk of fractures when used for the treatment of HT; however, it increased the risk of fractures when used for the treatment of VD in females. These results suggest that ABs should be used with caution in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sunohara et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Chronic kidney disease (n=115,954). Alpha blockers for voiding dysfunction vs. Alpha blockers for hypertension was evaluated on First hospitalisation due to fracture (HR 2.28, 95% CI 1.01-5.16, p=0.048). Alpha blocker use for voiding dysfunction significantly increased the risk of hospitalization for fractures in female patients with chronic kidney disease compared to alpha blockers for hypertension (HR 2.28).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: