Key result
Atrial fibrillation ablation remains effective even after a year of waiting.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An editorial discussing the timing of atrial fibrillation ablation and its sustained efficacy even after a delayed approach.
Journal Article Good rhythm control without haste: atrial fibrillation ablation remains effective after a year of waiting Get access Andreas Metzner, Andreas Metzner Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6818-6396 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Paulus Kirchhof Paulus Kirchhof Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, D-20246 Hamburg, GermanyGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg-Kiel-Lübeck, GermanyInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Corresponding author. Tel: +49 40 741053824, Fax: +49 40 741055862, Email: p.kirchhof@uke.de https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1881-0197 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar European Heart Journal, Volume 44, Issue 27, 14 July 2023, Pages 2455–2457, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad393 Published: 22 June 2023
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Metzner et al. (2023) conducted an editorial in Atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation ablation was evaluated. Atrial fibrillation ablation remains effective even after a year of waiting.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: