Key result
HFpEF after left-sided valve surgery was associated with higher all-cause mortality compared to surgical patients without heart failure (HR 1.80; 95% CI 1.25-2.57; P=0.001).
Why the study?
To investigate the epidemiological and prognostic relationship between HFpEF and left-sided valve surgery using all-cause mortality as a primary endpoint.
Does the presence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) after left-sided valve surgery increase all-cause mortality compared to patients without heart failure?
Cohort (n=973)
Does the presence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) after left-sided valve surgery increase all-cause mortality compared to patients without heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 1.8 (95% CI 1.25–2.57)
p-value: p=0.001
HFpEF is highly prevalent (67.4%) but severely underdiagnosed (12.5%) after left-sided valve surgery, and it is associated with a nearly two-fold increase in all-cause mortality.
HFpEF after left-sided valve surgery signals higher mortality risk; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve outcomes.
AIMS: To investigate the epidemiological and prognostic relationship between heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and left-sided valve surgery using all-cause mortality as a primary endpoint. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied a total of 973 patients, of whom 673 had undergone left-sided valve surgery (time from surgery to enrolment 50 ± 30 months after valve surgery) and 300 patients with HFpEF without prior surgery served as control group. Among patients after surgery, 67.4% fulfilled all criteria of HFpEF according to current guideline recommendations, 20.6% had no heart failure (HF), and 12.0% had HF with mid-range or reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFrEF). During 83 ± 39 months of follow-up, a total of 335 (34.4%) patients died. Compared to surgical patients with no subsequent HF, patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF/HFrEF after surgery showed significantly higher all-cause mortality rates [hazard ratio (HR) 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-2.57, P = 0.001; and HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.16-2.98, P = 0.010, respectively]. This increased mortality rate was similar to the control HFpEF group without surgery (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.38-3.02, P < 0.001). Results remained consistent after adjustment for clinical and imaging risk factors and when using the established HFA-PEFF risk score for HFpEF diagnosis. Notably, only 12.5% of HFpEF patients after surgery were diagnosed with HF despite regular follow-up visits by board-certified cardiologists. In contrast, 92.1% of HFmrEF/HFrEF patients after surgery were diagnosed correctly. CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction following left-sided valve surgery is highly prevalent, associated with unfavourable outcomes, but rarely recognized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kammerlander et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction after left-sided valve surgery (n=973). Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) vs. No subsequent heart failure after surgery was evaluated on all-cause mortality (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.25-2.57, p=0.001). HFpEF after left-sided valve surgery was associated with higher all-cause mortality compared to surgical patients without heart failure (HR 1.80; 95% CI 1.25-2.57; P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: