Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study identifies resource barriers affecting access to gene therapy in families of SCD patients, suggesting interventions for equality.
BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a highly morbid condition resulting in poor quality of life and early death. Gene therapy offers opportunity for cure, but its resource‑ and time‑intensive nature may limit access. PROCEDURE: We conducted a single-center, cross-sectional study to determine the proportion of families with a child with SCD who report the ability to access a hypothetical curative therapy and to identify family-reported resource barriers. A single-timepoint survey was administered to 100 families with children aged 2-17 years receiving sickle cell care at a quaternary care center. The survey queried parent-reported household characteristics and unmet basic needs in food, housing, utilities, or transportation (household material hardship [HMH]) and assessed parent-reported ability to access a hypothetical curative treatment based on a vignette. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations of HMH and disease severity with family-reported access. RESULTS: Of the evaluable 82 families, 60% experienced HMH over the prior 12 months despite robust social work involvement (78%) and participation in means-tested benefits (59%). Forty percent of parents reported an ability to obtain curative therapy with current resources. Upon adjustment for key covariates, HMH exposure was independently associated with 95% lower odds of family-reported ability to obtain curative therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although gene therapy offers a potential cure for SCD, fewer than half of families reported ability to access it with current supports. HMH exposure affected nearly two-thirds of families and was independently associated with lower odds of access. As highly centralized, resource-intensive treatments expand, resource-targeted interventions are needed to ensure equitable access and receipt.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kelly et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: