Why the study?
Observational studies have shown the safety and efficacy of the leadless WiSE-CRT system for dyssynchronous HF, but its cost-effectiveness had not been examined.
Is the WiSE-CRT system cost-effective for patients with dyssynchronous heart failure?
Is the WiSE-CRT system cost-effective for patients with dyssynchronous heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The WiSE-CRT system is a cost-effective treatment option for dyssynchronous heart failure over a lifetime horizon, though improvements in battery life are needed to maximize economic value.
BACKGROUND: The Wireless Stimulation Endocardially for CRT (WiSE-CRT) system is a novel technology used to treat patients with dyssynchronous heart failure (HF) by providing leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Observational studies have demonstrated its safety and efficacy profile, however, the treatment cost-effectiveness has not previously been examined. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness evaluation of the WiSE-CRT System was performed using a cohort-based economic model adopting a "proportion in state" structure. In addition to the primary analysis, scenario analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed to test for uncertainty in input parameters. Outcomes were quantified in terms of quality-adjusted life year (QALY) differences. RESULTS: The primary analysis demonstrated that treatment with the WiSE-CRT system is likely to be cost-effective over a lifetime horizon at a QALY reimbursement threshold of £20 000, with a net monetary benefit (NMB) of £3781 per QALY. Cost-effectiveness declines at time horizons shorter than 10 years. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that average system battery life had the largest impact on potential cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Within the model limitations, these findings support the use of WiSE-CRT in indicated patients from an economic standpoint. However, improving battery technology should be prioritized to maximize cost-effectiveness in times when health services are under significant financial pressures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wijesuriya et al. (2023) studied dyssynchronous heart failure (HF). Wireless Stimulation Endocardially for CRT (WiSE-CRT) system was evaluated on quality-adjusted life year (QALY) differences (NMB £3781 per QALY).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: