Key result
A proposed study design examining the interrater reliability of difference scores could evaluate whether holistic admission processes add useful information beyond statistical approaches.
Population
Medical school and graduate program admission processes
Comparison
Holistic admission approaches vs Statistical (actuarial) methods
Design
Other
Authors
Loading...
Statistical methods outperform holistic review for measurable outcomes; leaves open unmeasured benefits in medical admissions.
Proposes a methodological framework to evaluate whether holistic admission processes add valid information beyond statistical approaches.
Clarence D. Kreiter (2013) studied Admission processes. Holistic-based admission processes vs. Statistical (actuarial) methods was evaluated on Interrater reliability of difference scores. A proposed study design examining the interrater reliability of difference scores could evaluate whether holistic admission processes add useful information beyond statistical approaches.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: