Key result
Removing patients with a confirmed prescribing cascade equalized loop diuretic initiation rates before and after calcium channel blocker initiation (aSR 1.05; 95% CI 0.62-1.78).
Why the study?
The study evaluated the prescription sequence symmetry analysis assumption regarding balanced initiation rates of marker drugs before versus after index drug initiation in the absence of prescribing cascades.
Does prescription sequence symmetry analysis accurately identify prescribing cascades, such as loop diuretic initiation following DH CCB-induced edema?
Observational (n=90)
No
Does prescription sequence symmetry analysis accurately identify prescribing cascades, such as loop diuretic initiation following DH CCB-induced edema?
Relative Risk: 2.27 (95% CI 1.44–3.58)
Absolute Event Rate: 71.1% vs 28.9%
This study validates the prescription sequence symmetry analysis assumption by showing that loop diuretic initiation rates before and after DH CCB initiation are balanced when true prescribing cascades are excluded.
Supports validity of sequence symmetry analysis for cascade detection; confirms balance assumption in observational data.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prescription sequence symmetry analysis assumption regarding balance between marker drug (i.e., medication used to treat a drug-induced adverse event) initiation rates before and after initiation of an index drug (i.e., medication that is potentially associated with the drug-induced adverse event) in the absence of prescribing cascades, we used a well-described example of loop diuretic initiation to treat dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DH CCB)-induced edema. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The University of Florida Health Integrated Data Repository from June 2011 and July 2018 was used to assess temporal prescribing of DH CCB and loop diuretics within the prescription sequence symmetry analysis framework. Validation of the prescribing cascade was performed via clinical expert chart review. RESULTS: Among patients without heart failure who were initiated on DH CCB, 26 and 64 loop diuretics initiators started within 360 days before versus after DH CCB initiation, respectively, resulting in an adjusted sequence ratio (aSR) of 2.27 (95% CI, 1.44-3.58). Overall, 35 (54.7%) patients were determined to have a prescribing cascade. Removing patients who experienced a prescribing cascade resulted in an aSR of 1.05, 95% CI 0.62-1.78). CONCLUSION: Loop diuretic initiation rates before and after DH CCB initiation for reasons other a prescribing cascade were similar, thus confirming the prescription sequence symmetry analysis assumption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vouri et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Patients without heart failure initiated on dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (n=90). Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DH CCB) initiation vs. 360 days before DH CCB initiation was evaluated on Loop diuretic initiation after versus before DH CCB initiation (aSR 2.27, 95% CI 1.44-3.58). Removing patients with a confirmed prescribing cascade equalized loop diuretic initiation rates before and after calcium channel blocker initiation (aSR 1.05; 95% CI 0.62-1.78).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: