Key result
Pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes had significantly increased aortic intima-media thickness compared to controls (0.60 vs 0.52 mm, P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does type 1 diabetes mellitus increase intima-media thickness in different arterial segments compared to controls in pediatric patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=76)
Does type 1 diabetes mellitus increase intima-media thickness in different arterial segments compared to controls in pediatric patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.6% vs 0.52%
p-value: p=<.001
Aortic and femoral intima-media thickness are more sensitive than carotid and brachial IMT for detecting early macrovascular changes in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes.
May link AGE to early aortic changes in pediatric T1DM; leaves open need for longitudinal confirmation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) are at risk for premature atherosclerosis (AS), which has its origin in childhood. Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) is an established surrogate marker for subclinical AS in adults. The first macroscopically detectable AS changes, however, begin in the abdominal aorta. Advanced glycation end products (AGE) predict microvascular complications in diabetes. OBJECTIVES: To assess the sensitivity for early macrovascular changes of brachial, femoral, and aortic IMT compared to conventional carotid IMT in pediatric T1DM patients ; and the relationship of IMT with AGE. METHODS: Using high-resolution external ultrasound, carotid, brachial, femoral, and aortic IMT were prospectively analyzed in children and adolescents with established T1DM and in controls (Ctrls). AGE were estimated by skin intrinsic fluorescence (SIF). Other established cardiovascular risk factors were excluded. RESULTS: Seventy-six subjects (T1DM = 38; Ctrls = 38) with a mean age of 13.1 ± 4.0 years (6-19, median 13) qualified for analysis. Carotid, brachial, femoral, and aortic IMT analyses were feasible in 100%, 74%, 84%, and 92% of subjects, respectively. Aortic and femoral IMT were increased in T1DM patients (0.60 ± 0.11 vs 0.52 ± 0.10 mm, P < .001; and 0.41 ± 0.07 vs 0.36 ± 0.07 mm, P < .01, respectively) while carotid and brachial IMT were not. AGE levels were elevated in T1DM patients and correlated with aortic IMT only. The influence of AGE on aIMT did not remain significant after adjusting for T1DM and age in our small population. CONCLUSION: We found aortic IMT-and to a lesser degree femoral IMT-to be more sensitive than carotid and brachial IMT for detecting early macrovascular changes in pediatric T1DM patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lilje et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 1 diabetes mellitus (n=76). Type 1 diabetes mellitus vs. Controls was evaluated on Aortic intima-media thickness (mm) (p=<.001). Pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes had significantly increased aortic intima-media thickness compared to controls (0.60 vs 0.52 mm, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: