Key result
Defibrillation threshold voltages declined exponentially with increasing pulse width, from 566+/-100 V at 2 ms to an asymptote of 451+/-68 V by 6 ms (P<.05), and were insensitive to longer widths.
Why the study?
How does pulse duration affect defibrillation threshold in patients undergoing transvenous defibrillator implantation?
RCT (n=29)
Randomized order of testing
How does pulse duration affect defibrillation threshold in patients undergoing transvenous defibrillator implantation?
p-value: p=<.05
The strength-duration curve for human transvenous defibrillation shows that threshold voltage declines exponentially to an asymptote by 6 ms, indicating fundamental differences from cardiac stimulation.
May support 6 ms pulse widths to minimize thresholds; leaves open effects on clinical defibrillation success.
BACKGROUND: One of the basic characteristics of electrical defibrillation is the strength-duration relationship, or the effect of pulse width on defibrillation efficacy. This relationship is important for understanding the mechanism of defibrillation and for the design of optimal waveforms. However, a detailed evaluation of the strength-duration relationship for human transvenous defibrillation has not been performed previously. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prospective study of 29 patients undergoing initial defibrillator implantation with a uniform dual coil, transvenous lead. In each patient defibrillation thresholds were measured for either short (2, 3, 4, 6 ms) or long (6, 12, 18 ms) pulse durations, with the order of testing randomized. The shock waveform was a truncated monophasic pulse from a capacitor of 150 microF. The leading edge voltage at defibrillation threshold was 566+/-100 V for 2-ms pulses. Voltages declined exponentially with increasing pulse width reaching an asymptote by 6 ms (451+/-68 V, P<.05). Defibrillation threshold voltage was insensitive to longer pulse widths. Stored energy at defibrillation threshold showed a similar relationship with pulse width. In contrast, mean current decreased monotonically over the full range of pulse durations evaluated, and there was no evidence of a rheobase. CONCLUSIONS: The shape of the strength-duration curve and the lack of rheobase current indicate a fundamental difference between cardiac stimulation and defibrillation. The relationship between pulse duration and defibrillation threshold voltage or stored energy is well modeled by a parallel capacitor resistor circuit with a time constant of 5.3 ms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gold et al. (1997) conducted an RCT in Initial defibrillator implantation (n=29). Different pulse durations (short vs long) vs. Within-patient comparison was evaluated on Defibrillation threshold voltage (p=<.05). Defibrillation threshold voltages declined exponentially with increasing pulse width, from 566+/-100 V at 2 ms to an asymptote of 451+/-68 V by 6 ms (P<.05), and were insensitive to longer widths.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: