This large-scale student-centered, evaluation of the California Drug, Alcohol, and Tobacco Education (DATE) program shows how a state policy directed toward students at risk for substance abuse shapes perceptions, influences program directions, and affects both "at-risk" and "thriving" students. Qualitative data analysis revealed that a risk-oriented policy from the state influenced educators to use the risk factor model to shape services and identify at-risk students. Despite high implementation levels of services like Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE), few (if any) positive effects on either at-risk students or thriving students were found. Although the program was directed to assist at-risk students, identification often preceded detention, suspension, or expulsion. For two reasons, researchers question the validity of the risk factor model as an effective school-based substance abuse prevention tool: (a) the risk factor model is inherently difficult to implement, and (b) it is misused as an individual diagnostic tool. Implications are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brown et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: