Key result
The upper limit of vulnerability (ULV50) in humans is lower than the defibrillation threshold (DFT50) and strongly correlates with it.
Why the study?
Does an upper limit of vulnerability exist in humans and does it correlate with the defibrillation threshold?
Observational (n=13)
Does an upper limit of vulnerability exist in humans and does it correlate with the defibrillation threshold?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study provides evidence that an upper limit of vulnerability exists in humans and correlates strongly with the defibrillation threshold, supporting the ULV hypothesis of defibrillation.
BACKGROUND: In the canine model, an upper limit of shock strength exists that can induce ventricular fibrillation during the vulnerable period of the cardiac cycle. This shock strength (the upper limit of vulnerability) closely correlates with the defibrillation threshold and supports the "upper limit of vulnerability" hypothesis of defibrillation. It is not known whether an upper limit of vulnerability exists in humans or whether this limit correlates with the defibrillation threshold. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 13 patients undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, the shock strengths associated with a 50% probability of reaching the upper limit of vulnerability (ULV50) and a 50% probability of reaching the defibrillation threshold (DFT50) were determined by the up-down algorithm. The ULV50 was determined only for the mid-upslope of the positive T waves and for the mid-downslope of the negative T waves. No major complications occurred during surgery. An upper limit of vulnerability was demonstrated in each patient. The ULV50 was 300 +/- 138 V or 6.8 +/- 5.8 J, which was significantly lower than the DFT50 of 347 +/- 167 V (p = 0.038) or 9.1 +/- 7.3 J (p = 0.013). The correlation between the ULV50 and the DFT50 was significant (r = 0.90, p < 0.001 for voltage; r = 0.93, p < 0.001 for energy). CONCLUSIONS: An upper limit of vulnerability is present in humans. There is a significant correlation between the ULV50 and the DFT50, and the ULV50 is significantly lower than the DFT50.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (1993) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation (n=13). Upper limit of vulnerability (ULV50) vs. Defibrillation threshold (DFT50) was evaluated on Correlation between ULV50 and DFT50 (r = 0.93, p=<0.001). The upper limit of vulnerability (ULV50) in humans is lower than the defibrillation threshold (DFT50) and strongly correlates with it.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: