Key result
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in heart failure patients were associated with significantly less improvement in quality of life over time compared to patients without ICDs.
Why the study?
Does the presence of an ICD affect quality of life trajectories in patients with heart failure?
Does the presence of an ICD affect quality of life trajectories in patients with heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This editorial highlights that while structured HF care improves QoL, patients with ICDs experience significantly less improvement, emphasizing the need for holistic care addressing their unique psychological burden.
This invited editorial refers to ‘Quality of life in patients with heart failure and implantable cardioverter defibrillator: results from 9274 patients in 42 outpatient heart failure clinics in the National Norwegian Heart Failure Registry’, by H. Flagtvedt et al., https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf062. In the era of precision cardiology, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) remain a cornerstone of sudden cardiac death prevention in selected patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).1 However, the story of ICDs extends beyond mortality benefit—it intersects with lived patient experiences, psychological burden, and quality of life (QoL). In this issue of the European Heart Journal – Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes, Flagtvedt et al.2 present a comprehensive analysis of QoL trajectories in 9274 patients from the National Norwegian Heart Failure Registry, including 1206 patients with ICDs, across 42 outpatient heart failure clinics. Analysing data from over 9000 patients within the National Norwegian Heart Failure Registry, including more than 1200 ICD recipients, the authors report a key finding: while QoL improves over time in both groups after follow-up in structured HF clinics, the degree of improvement is significantly less in those with ICDs. This nuanced observation brings to the fore a critical and often underappreciated aspect of HF management—the unique psychological and functional challenges faced by patients living with ICDs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amina Rakisheva (2025) conducted an editorial in Heart failure (n=9,274). Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) vs. Heart failure patients without ICDs was evaluated on Quality of life (QoL) trajectories. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in heart failure patients were associated with significantly less improvement in quality of life over time compared to patients without ICDs.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: