Why the study?
Studies on quality of life in patients with heart failure and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator attending follow-up in outpatient heart failure clinics were sparse.
Does having an ICD affect the improvement in quality of life over time in patients with heart failure attending outpatient clinics?
Does having an ICD affect the improvement in quality of life over time in patients with heart failure attending outpatient clinics?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Patients with heart failure and an ICD experience less improvement in quality of life during outpatient follow-up compared to those without an ICD, highlighting the need for tailored care programs.
AIMS: Patients with heart failure (HF) have increased risk of sudden cardiac death, and treatment with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has become standard treatment for selected patient groups. HF is associated with impaired quality of life (QoL), but studies on QoL in patients with HF and ICD attending follow-up in outpatient HF clinics is sparse. Hence, this study aimed to determine QoL over time in patients with HF with and without ICD using data from the first visit (baseline) and follow-up visit in 42 outpatient HF clinics. METHODS AND RESULTS: Longitudinal real-world data from the National Norwegian Heart Failure Registry including 9274 patients, of which 1206 with ICD, were studied. QoL was assessed using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Patients with ICD were younger, more often men, and had a higher frequency of coronary artery disease (all P < 0.001). At the first visit, no significant difference in QoL was found between patients with HF with and without ICD, and both groups had significant improvement in QoL from the first to the follow-up visit (P < 0.001). However, patients with HF and ICD reported significantly less improvement (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: QoL in patients with ICD improves after follow-up in an outpatient HF clinic, although not to the same extent as in patients without ICD. Thus, tailored interventions through a combined HF-ICD care programme are needed to improve QoL in this subgroup of patients with both HF and ICD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Flagtvedt et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: