Why the study?
Primary pulmonary MALT lymphoma is a rare disease with favorable prognosis, but its clinical characteristics, diagnosis, treatment, and prognoses remain unclear.
Does surgical resection improve overall survival or progression-free survival compared to non-surgical management in patients with pulmonary MALT lymphoma?
Population
80 patients with pathologically confirmed MALT lymphoma from 2006 to 2018
Comparison
Surgery group vs biopsy group
Design
Retrospective cohort study
Key result
Surgical resection resulted in no significant difference in overall survival or progression-free survival compared to non-surgical management in patients with pulmonary MALT lymphoma.
Authors
Loading...
No survival benefit seen with resection; hypothesis-generating and should not yet alter management without prospective trials.
Cohort (n=80)
Does surgical resection improve overall survival or progression-free survival compared to non-surgical management in patients with pulmonary MALT lymphoma?
Pulmonary MALT lymphoma is an indolent disease with a favorable prognosis where surgical resection does not significantly improve survival compared to non-surgical management, though it remains important for diagnosis.
Wang et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Primary pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue-derived (MALT) lymphoma (n=80). Surgical resection vs. Without surgical resection (biopsy group) was evaluated on Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Surgical resection resulted in no significant difference in overall survival or progression-free survival compared to non-surgical management in patients with pulmonary MALT lymphoma.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: