Why the study?
Do exercise gas exchange responses during a maximal ramping cycle-ergometer test differentiate pathologic (HCM) from physiologic (athlete's heart) left ventricular hypertrophy in young males?
Do exercise gas exchange responses during a maximal ramping cycle-ergometer test differentiate pathologic (HCM) from physiologic (athlete's heart) left ventricular hypertrophy in young males?
Maximal and submaximal exercise gas exchange parameters can serve as a noninvasive tool to differentiate between pathologic (HCM) and physiologic left ventricular hypertrophy.
May aid noninvasive differentiation of HCM from athlete's heart; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the present investigation was to examine differences that may exist in maximal and submaximal exercise gas exchange parameters and their use in differentiating pathological and physiological left ventricular hypertrophy. METHODS: Exercise gas exchange responses were measured on-line during a maximal ramping cycle-ergometer exercise test in 10 young, male hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients, 11 elite triathletes, and 9 normal controls. RESULTS: The HCM patients exhibited significantly lower VO2max, anaerobic threshold (AT) in both absolute terms (ATVO2) and as a percentage of VO2max (AT%VO2max), and oxygen-pulse (O2-pulse) compared with triathletes and normal controls. Elite triathletes exhibited significantly increased VO2max, %VO2max, ATVO2, AT%VO2max and O2-pulse compared with controls. The VE/VCO2 at AT was significantly increased in the HCM patients compared with triathletes and controls, whereas no difference was observed between triathletes and controls. CONCLUSIONS: Maximal and submaximal exercise gas exchange responses may be used as an additional noninvasive tool in the differential diagnosis of physiologic and pathologic left ventricular hypertrophy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Whyte et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: