Key result
Balloon aortic valvuloplasty as a bridge to valve replacement was associated with lower mortality compared to BAV alone (22.3% vs 55.2%, P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does balloon aortic valvuloplasty as a bridge to T/SAVR improve survival compared to BAV alone in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Population
472 high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis
Comparison
Balloon aortic valvuloplasty as a bridge to… vs Balloon aortic valvuloplasty as a standalone…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
Median 183 days for BAV alone, 378 days for BAV as a bridge
Authors
Loading...
Supports BAV bridging in high-risk severe AS; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of survival benefit.
Cohort (n=472)
Does balloon aortic valvuloplasty as a bridge to T/SAVR improve survival compared to BAV alone in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Absolute Event Rate: 22.3% vs 55.2%
p-value: p=< 0.001
In high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, balloon aortic valvuloplasty serves as an effective bridge to definitive valve replacement, associated with significantly lower mortality than BAV alone.
Ben‐Dor et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in severe aortic stenosis (n=472). Balloon aortic valvuloplasty as a bridge to T/SAVR vs. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty alone was evaluated on Mortality (p=< 0.001). Balloon aortic valvuloplasty as a bridge to valve replacement was associated with lower mortality compared to BAV alone (22.3% vs 55.2%, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: