Key result
Balloon aortic valvuloplasty as rescue or bridge therapy for severe aortic stenosis resulted in a 12-month mortality of 28.3%, which rose to 66.9% in hemodynamically unstable rescue patients.
Why the study?
To assess procedural complications, patient flow, and clinical outcomes after balloon aortic valvuloplasty performed as rescue or bridge therapy.
What are the clinical outcomes and predictors of mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty as rescue or bridge therapy?
Observational (n=374)
What are the clinical outcomes and predictors of mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty as rescue or bridge therapy?
Balloon aortic valvuloplasty remains a viable bridge to definitive therapy for severe aortic stenosis, allowing for symptom improvement and LV recovery, though it carries a high 12-month mortality rate when used as a destination or rescue therapy.
Registry data inform BAV bridging or rescue use in aortic stenosis; leaves open need for randomized trials on selection and outcomes.
The study aimed to assess procedural complications, patient flow and clinical outcomes after balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) as rescue or bridge therapy, based on data from our registry. A total of 382 BAVs in 374 patients was performed. The main primary indication for BAV was a bridge for TAVI (n = 185, 49.4%). Other indications included a bridge for AVR (n = 26, 6.9%) and rescue procedure in hemodynamically unstable patients (n = 139, 37.2%). The mortality rate at 30 days, 6 and 12 months was 10.4%, 21.6%, 28.3%, respectively. In rescue patients, the death rate raised to 66.9% at 12 months. A significant improvement in symptoms was confirmed after BAV, after 30 days, 6 months, and in survivors after 1 year (p < 0.05 for all). Independent predictors of 12-month mortality were baseline STS score [HR (95% CI) 1.42 (1.34 to 2.88), p < 0.0001], baseline LVEF <20% [HR (95% CI) 1.89 (1.55–2.83), p < 0.0001] and LVEF <30% at 1 month [HR (95% CI) 1.97 (1.62–3.67), p < 0.0001] adjusted for age/gender. In everyday clinical practice in the TAVI era, there are still clinical indications to BAV a standalone procedure as a bridge to surgery, TAVI or for urgent high risk non-cardiac surgical procedures. Patients may improve clinically after BAV with LV function recovery, allowing to perform final therapy, within limited time window, for severe AS which ameliorates long-term outcomes. On the other hand, in patients for whom an isolated BAV becomes a destination therapy, prognosis is extremely poor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kleczyński et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Severe Aortic Stenosis (n=374). Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) was evaluated on Mortality at 12 months. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty as rescue or bridge therapy for severe aortic stenosis resulted in a 12-month mortality of 28.3%, which rose to 66.9% in hemodynamically unstable rescue patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: