Key result
Among patients undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty for severe aortic stenosis, subsequent aortic valve replacement was associated with higher 1-year survival compared to no replacement (78% vs 44%; P=0.024).
Why the study?
Does subsequent aortic valve replacement improve survival in high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who underwent balloon aortic valvuloplasty?
Population
90 consecutive patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis with no immediate surgical option…
Comparison
Balloon aortic valvuloplasty with subsequent… vs Balloon aortic valvuloplasty without subsequent…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
Average 55 ± 57 months and 16 ± 23 months
Authors
Loading...
Supports AVR after BAV for higher 1-year survival in severe AS; leaves open selection bias versus benefit, needing RCTs.
Cohort (n=90)
Does subsequent aortic valve replacement improve survival in high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who underwent balloon aortic valvuloplasty?
Absolute Event Rate: 78% vs 44%
p-value: p=0.024
Balloon aortic valvuloplasty can serve as an effective bridge to aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, significantly improving 1-year survival when AVR is achieved.
Kapadia et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (n=90). Aortic valve replacement (AVR) post-balloon aortic valvuloplasty vs. No aortic valve replacement was evaluated on 1-year survival rate (p=0.024). Among patients undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty for severe aortic stenosis, subsequent aortic valve replacement was associated with higher 1-year survival compared to no replacement (78% vs 44%; P=0.024).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: