Why the study?
Does the implementation of a TAVI program change the volume, indications, and outcomes of balloon aortic valvuloplasty in patients with aortic stenosis?
Does the implementation of a TAVI program change the volume, indications, and outcomes of balloon aortic valvuloplasty in patients with aortic stenosis?
The implementation of a TAVI program significantly increased the volume and shifted the indications of balloon aortic valvuloplasty, which remains a viable bridge to definitive therapy or palliation in high-risk patients.
BAV volume rose with TAVI programs as a bridge in high-risk AS; leaves open optimal selection and outcomes in prospective studies.
The development of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has increased the use of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) in treating aortic stenosis. We evaluated our use of BAV in an academic tertiary referral center with a developing TAVI program. We reviewed 69 consecutive stand-alone BAV procedures that were performed in 62 patients (mean age, 77 ± 10 yr; 62% men; baseline mean New York Heart Association functional class, 3 ± 1) from January 2009 through December 2012. Enrollment for the CoreValve(®) clinical trial began in January 2011. We divided the study cohort into 2 distinct periods, defined as pre-TAVI (2009-2010) and TAVI (2011-2012). We reviewed clinical, hemodynamic, and follow-up data, calculating each BAV procedure as a separate case. Stand-alone BAV use increased 145% from the pre-TAVI period to the TAVI period. The mean aortic gradient reduction was 13 ± 10 mmHg. Patients were successfully bridged as intended to cardiac or noncardiac surgery in 100% of instances and to TAVI in 60%. Five patients stabilized with BAV subsequently underwent surgical aortic valve replacement with no operative deaths. The overall in-hospital mortality rate (17.4%) was highest in emergent patients (61%). The implementation of a TAVI program was associated with a significant change in BAV volumes and indications. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty can successfully bridge patients to surgery or TAVI, although least successfully in patients nearer death. As TAVI expands to more centers and higher-risk patient groups, BAV might become integral to collaborative treatment decisions by surgeons and interventional cardiologists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hui et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: