Key result
External beam radiation therapy following balloon aortic valvuloplasty in elderly patients is feasible, with a 1-year restenosis rate of 11% in the high-dose group and 30% in the low-dose group.
Why the study?
Does external beam radiation therapy following balloon aortic valvuloplasty prevent restenosis in elderly patients with calcific aortic stenosis?
Does external beam radiation therapy following balloon aortic valvuloplasty prevent restenosis in elderly patients with calcific aortic stenosis?
Absolute Event Rate: 11% vs 30%
External beam radiation therapy following balloon aortic valvuloplasty is feasible and may reduce 1-year restenosis rates in a dose-dependent manner in elderly patients with calcific aortic stenosis.
May support dose-dependent restenosis reduction post-BAV; hypothesis-generating from Level 3 data and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: We wished to determine the feasibility and early safety of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) used following balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) to prevent restenosis. BACKGROUND: BAV for calcific aortic stenosis (AS) has been largely abandoned because of high restenosis rates, i.e., > 80% at 1 year. Radiation therapy is useful in preventing restenosis following vascular interventions and treating other benign noncardiovascular disorders. METHODS: We conducted a 20-patient, pilot study evaluating EBRT to prevent restenosis following BAV in elderly patients with calcific AS. Total doses ranging from 12-18 Gy were delivered in fractions over a 3-5 day post-op period to the aortic valve. Echocardiography was performed pre and 2 days post-op, 1, 6, and 12 months following BAV. RESULTS: One-year follow-up is completed (age 89 +/- 4). There were no complications related to EBRT. Eight patients died prior to 1 year; 5 of 10 (50%) in the low-dose (12 Gy) group and 3 of 10 (30%) in the high-dose (15-18 Gy) group. None of these 8 patients had restenosis, i.e., > 50% loss of the initial AVA gain, and only three deaths were cardiac in origin. One patient underwent aortic valve replacement and none repeated BAV. By 1 year, 3 of the initial 10 (30%) in the low-dose group and 1 of 9 (11%) in the high-dose group demonstrated restenosis (21% overall). CONCLUSIONS: EBRT following BAV in elderly patients with AS is feasible, free of early complications, and holds promise in reducing the 1 year restenosis rate in a dose-dependent fashion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pedersen et al. (2006) studied Calcific aortic stenosis (n=20). External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) vs. Low-dose (12 Gy) vs High-dose (15-18 Gy) was evaluated on Restenosis (> 50% loss of the initial AVA gain) at 1 year. External beam radiation therapy following balloon aortic valvuloplasty in elderly patients is feasible, with a 1-year restenosis rate of 11% in the high-dose group and 30% in the low-dose group.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: