Key result
Compared with nulliparity, parity of 1-2, 3-4, and 5+ live births were significantly associated with increased odds of cardiovascular disease (OR 1.85, 1.70, and 1.92, respectively).
Why the study?
Current evidence on the association between parity and cardiovascular disease risk remains inconclusive.
Does parity increase the risk of cardiovascular disease in women over 45 years of age?
Cross-Sectional (n=8,882)
Yes
Does parity increase the risk of cardiovascular disease in women over 45 years of age?
Odds Ratio: 1.85 (95% CI 1.29–2.64)
p-value: p=<0.05
Parity is significantly associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease in women over 45 years of age compared to nulliparity.
Parity may inform individualized CVD risk discussions in women ≥45; leaves open causal confirmation and practice change pending prospective data.
Objective: Current research results on the association between parity and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk are inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between parity and risk of CVD in women over 45 years of age. Materials and Methods: Data were from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for 2007–2018. A total of 8,882 women ≥45 years of age were included. The exposure of parity referred to the number of live births, and the outcome variable was the occurrence of CVD events, including stroke, heart attack, coronary heart disease (CHD), heart failure, and angina. We performed logistic regression to calculate the unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs; 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) controlling for confounding factors. Results: Among 8,882 women, the mean age was 62.4 ± 10.8 years, with a range of 45 to 80 years. The weighted prevalence of CVD, stroke, heart attack, CHD, heart failure, and angina in parous women were significantly higher than those of nulliparous women ( p < 0.05). After adjusting for demographic factors, CVD risk factors, reproductive factors, the ORs of CVD with parity 1–2, 3–4, and 5+ were 1.85 (95% CI: 1.29–2.64), 1.70 (95% CI: 1.15–2.50), and 1.92 (95% CI: 1.28–2.88), respectively. The odds of stroke and heart attack were also significantly positively related to increasing parity compared with nulliparity. However, compared with nulliparity, parity of 3 was associated with a slightly lower risk of CVD. Conclusions: Our findings indicated that parity was significantly positively associated with CVD, giving birth to three children associated with a slightly lower risk compared with nulliparity. Further cohort studies are warranted to confirm the findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xing et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease (n=8,882). Parity vs. Nulliparity was evaluated on Occurrence of CVD events, including stroke, heart attack, coronary heart disease (CHD), heart failure, and angina (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.29-2.64, p=<0.05). Compared with nulliparity, parity of 1-2, 3-4, and 5+ live births were significantly associated with increased odds of cardiovascular disease (OR 1.85, 1.70, and 1.92, respectively).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: