PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 2, 2013European Heart Journal103 citations

Risk stratification in patients with acute chest pain using three high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays

View Full Paper
PHPhilip HaafTRTobias ReichlinRTRaphael Twerenbold

Structured PICO

Does hs-cTnT provide more accurate prognostic information for 2-year mortality compared to hs-cTnI and conventional cTnT in patients with acute chest pain?

P
Population
1117 unselected patients with acute chest pain
I
Intervention
High-sensitivity cardiac Troponin T (hs-cTnT) assay
C
Comparator
High-sensitivity cardiac Troponin I (hs-cTnI) assays and conventional cTnT assay
O
Outcome
2-year mortalityhard clinical

High-sensitivity cardiac Troponin T is more accurate than hs-cTnI in predicting long-term mortality in patients with acute chest pain, with initial presentation values being sufficient for risk stratification.

Abstract

AIMS: Several high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays have recently been developed. It is unknown which hs-cTn provides the most accurate prognostic information and to what extent early changes in hs-cTn predict mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective, international multicentre study, cTn was simultaneously measured with three novel high-sensitivity cardiac Troponin T (hs-cTnT), Roche Diagnostics; hs-cTnI, Beckman-Coulter; hs-cTnI, Siemens and a conventional assay (cTnT, Roche Diagnostics) in a blinded fashion in 1117 unselected patients with acute chest pain. Patients were followed up 2 years regarding mortality. Eighty-two (7.3%) patients died during the follow-up. The 2-year prognostic accuracy of hs-cTn was most accurate for hs-cTnT area under the receivers operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.78 (95% CI: 0.73-0.83) and outperformed both hs-cTnI (Beckman-Coulter, 0.71 (95% CI: 0.65-0.77; P = 0.001 for comparison), hs-cTnI (Siemens) 0.70 (95% CI: 0.64-0.76; P < 0.001 for comparison) and cTnT 0.67 (95% CI: 0.61-0.74; P < 0.001 for comparison). Absolute changes of hs-cTnT were more accurate than relative changes in predicting mortality, but inferior to presentation values of hs-cTnT. Combining changes of hs-cTnT within the first 6 h with their presentation values did not further improve prognostic accuracy. Similar results were obtained for both hs-cTnI assays regarding the incremental value of changes. Hs-cTn concentrations remained predictors of death in clinically challenging subgroups such as patients with pre-existing coronary artery disease, impaired renal function, and patients older than 75 years. CONCLUSION: High-sensitivity cardiac Troponin T is more accurate than hs-cTnI in the prediction of long-term mortality. Changes of hs-cTn do not seem to further improve risk stratification beyond initial presentation values.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Haaf et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6f663078a11c550e091952https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht218
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper