Why the study?
Do PPAR alpha ligands inhibit endothelin-induced hypertrophy in neonatal rat cardiac myocytes?
Do PPAR alpha ligands inhibit endothelin-induced hypertrophy in neonatal rat cardiac myocytes?
PPAR alpha ligands suppress endothelin-induced hypertrophy in neonatal rat cardiac myocytes, suggesting potential utility in managing myocardial hypertrophy and remodeling.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not change practice; leaves open translation of PPARα effects from neonatal rat myocytes to clinical hypertrophy.
The peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) appear to have beneficial effects in the cardiovascular system. PPAR gamma has been shown previously to exert an inhibitory effect on cardiac myocyte hypertrophy in vivo and in vitro. Using endothelin to activate the hypertrophic program in neonatal rat cardiac myocytes, we demonstrate that PPAR alpha ligands (fenofibrate and WY14,643) suppress hypertrophy-dependent increases in protein synthesis, cell surface area, and sarcomeric organization in vitro. This was accompanied by a decrease in brain natriuretic peptide gene expression, a marker of transcriptional activation in hypertrophy. These effects were equivalent to or greater than those seen with the PPAR gamma agonist rosiglitazone. Fenofibrate and rosiglitazone suppressed endothelin stimulation of human brain natriuretic peptide gene promoter activity, and this effect was amplified by cotransfection of PPAR alpha and PPAR gamma expression vectors, respectively. The fenofibrate-dependent suppression of endothelin's stimulatory activity was dependent upon promoter sequence positioned between -904 and -40 relative to the transcription start site and did not appear to involve a number of positive and negative regulatory elements that are known to govern transcription of this gene. These findings suggest that PPAR alpha ligands could prove to be useful in the management of disorders associated with hypertrophy and remodeling of the myocardium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liang et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: