Why the study?
Does pacing at the site of longest left ventricular electrical delay (Q-LV interval) improve acute hemodynamics (LV dP/dtmax) in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Population
32 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation, mean age 71±11…
Comparison
Pacing at different sites in tributary veins of… vs Baseline and pacing at alternative sites.
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
Acute (during implantation)
Authors
Loading...
May guide LV lead placement to longest Q-LV sites for acute CRT response; hypothesis-generating pending randomized outcome trials.
Does pacing at the site of longest left ventricular electrical delay (Q-LV interval) improve acute hemodynamics (LV dP/dtmax) in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Pacing the left ventricle at the site of longest electrical delay (Q-LV interval) during CRT implantation strongly predicts maximum acute hemodynamic improvement.
Zanon et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: