Why the study?
Does cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) improve regional septal work in a computational model of heart failure with left bundle branch block?
Does cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) improve regional septal work in a computational model of heart failure with left bundle branch block?
Computational modeling suggests that CRT improves septal work by increasing the peak work rate per unit volume through slower, more effective contraction against LV free wall resistance.
Offers computational hypothesis for CRT septal mechanics; leaves open validation in patients before practice implications.
Regulation of regional work is essential for efficient cardiac function. In patients with heart failure and electrical dysfunction such as left branch bundle block regional work is often depressed in the septum. Following cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) this heterogeneous distribution of work can be rebalanced by altering the pattern of electrical activation. To investigate the changes in regional work in these patients and the mechanisms underpinning the improved function following CRT we have developed a personalised computational model. Simulations of electromechanical cardiac function in the model estimate the regional stress, strain and work pre- and post-CRT. These simulations predict that the increase in observed work performed by the septum following CRT is not due to an increase in the volume of myocardial tissue recruited during contraction but rather that the volume of recruited myocardium remains the same and the average peak work rate per unit volume increases. These increases in the peak average rate of work is is attributed to slower and more effective contraction in the septum, as opposed to a change in active tension. Model results predict that this improved septal work rate following CRT is a result of resistance to septal contraction provided by the LV free wall. This resistance results in septal shortening over a longer period which, in turn, allows the septum to contract while generating higher levels of active tension to produce a higher work rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niederer et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: