Why the study?
Mean platelet volume has gained attention as a marker of atherosclerosis, but whether it predicts carotid atherosclerosis in diabetic patients at intermediate or high cardiovascular risk remained unconfirmed.
Does mean platelet volume correlate with carotid artery thickness in patients with diabetes at intermediate or high risk for cardiovascular diseases?
Does mean platelet volume correlate with carotid artery thickness in patients with diabetes at intermediate or high risk for cardiovascular diseases?
Mean platelet volume does not correlate with carotid artery thickness in diabetic patients at intermediate to high CVD risk, suggesting it is not a useful marker for atherosclerosis in this population.
MPV may aid carotid atherosclerosis risk stratification in diabetes; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
The number of patients with diabetes with a risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) is increasing worldwide, leading to a higher demand for evaluating atherosclerosis. Recently, the mean platelet volume (MPV) available from complete blood count is gaining attention as a marker of underlying atherosclerotic lesions. In the current study, we examined whether MPV can predict carotid atherosclerosis in patients with diabetes at an intermediate or high risk for CVD. A total of 224 patients with diabetes aged 36-85 years who underwent carotid ultrasound examination were assessed. The risk of CVD was evaluated using the Suita score. The greatest carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in each common carotid artery (CCA Max-IMT), carotid bulb, internal carotid artery, or external carotid artery (Total Max-IMT) was measured. Subsequently, the relationship between MPV and IMT was analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups according to their MPV values (<9.5 fl, tertile 1; 9.5-10.2 fl, tertile 2; and >10.2 fl, tertile 3). A correlation was observed between MPV and platelet count (P < 0.001), platelet distribution width (P < 0.001), and glycated hemoglobin (P = 0.04); however, multivariate logistic regression analyses demonstrated no relationship between MPV and CCA Max-IMT [odds ratio, 0.89 (0.60-1.29), P = 0.54] or Total Max-IMT [odds ratio, 0.87 (0.61-1.24), P = 0.45]. MPV did not correlate with carotid artery thickness. Therefore, it is difficult to determine the significance of MPV in atherosclerotic conditions from this study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sadatani et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: