Why the study?
Does valsartan provide comparable efficacy and better tolerability compared to lisinopril in elderly patients with essential hypertension?
Does valsartan provide comparable efficacy and better tolerability compared to lisinopril in elderly patients with essential hypertension?
Valsartan offers comparable long-term antihypertensive efficacy to lisinopril in elderly patients, but with a significantly lower incidence of drug-related cough.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Similar long-term response rates support either agent in elderly hypertension; confirms efficacy equivalence between valsartan and lisinopril.
A total of 501 elderly patients with essential hypertension were randomized to receive valsartan or lisinopril in this one year multi-center, double-blind, parallel group trial. Patients received valsartan 40 mg (n = 334) or lisinopril 2.5 mg (n = 167) daily for 2 weeks with subsequent titration (alone or in combination with hydroclorothiazide), depending on response to treatment. The primary efficacy variable was the percentage of patients with a response, defined as sitting diastolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg or drop of > or = 10 mmHg from baseline. A high percentage of patients responded to treatment in both valsartan and lisinopril groups: 80% for both groups at 12 weeks and 81% and 87%, respectively, at 52 weeks with no statistically significant difference between treatments (12 weeks, p = 0.925; 52 weeks, p = 0.148). More patients on lisinopril experienced drug-related cough (7.5% on valsartan, 17.4% on lisinopril). In 5.4% of lisinopril treated patients, cough led to discontinuation of therapy compared to 0.6% on valsartan. Valsartan 80 mg daily provides comparable short and long-term antihypertensive efficacy to lisinopril in elderly patients with a lower incidence of drug-related cough.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ad et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: