Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the relationship between retinopathy and CIMT as non-invasive methods for early detection of micro- and macrovascular complications of diabetes.
Does the presence of diabetic retinopathy correlate with increased carotid intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Does the presence of diabetic retinopathy correlate with increased carotid intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
The presence of diabetic retinopathy is strongly associated with increased carotid intima-media thickness, highlighting its potential utility as an early marker for macrovascular risk in diabetic patients.
Introduction Patients with diabetes having advanced stage of diabetic retinopathy (DR) may predict future risk of coronary artery disease. To predict cardiovascular outcomes carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) is utilized in diabetic patients. The aim of our study was the evaluation of the relationship between retinopathy and CIMT as two valuable non-invasive methods for early detection of micro- and macrovascular complication of diabetes. Methods This comparative cross-sectional study was conducted in the internal medicine ward of tertiary care hospital in Pakistan from November 2020 to January 2021. Three hundred patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and 300 control subjects were enrolled in the study after taking informed consent. Ophthalmological examination was done to screen patients for DR. CIMT was evaluated by a Doppler ultrasound for both carotid arteries. Results Carotid artery intimal thickness was more in patients with retinopathy compared to patients without retinopathy in both right (0.77 ± 0.16 vs. 0.66 ± 0.12; p-value: <0.0001) and left carotid artery (0.77 ± 0.15 vs. 0.65 ± 0.11; p-value: <0.0001). Conclusion In our study, there was a correlation between DR and CIMT. Screening for DR, which may be a potential early marker for complications, may help detect patients at risk of various macro and microvascular complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Talpur et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: