Why the study?
Does intracoronary administration of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-NMMA alter corrected sinus node recovery time in humans?
Does intracoronary administration of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-NMMA alter corrected sinus node recovery time in humans?
Intracoronary administration of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-NMMA prolongs sinus node recovery time, demonstrating that nitric oxide modulates human sinus node automaticity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May suggest NO modulates human sinus node function; hypothesis-generating and should not yet alter practice.
In vitro studies indicate that nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitors alter sinus node automaticity. Moreover, whereas the systemic delivery of N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), a NOS inhibitor, results in sinus bradycardia and arterial hypertension, its intracoronary administration has little effect on sinus heart rate. Therefore whether L-NMMA directly alters sinus node function in humans is not known. By using a crossover design, we evaluated the effect of intracoronary L-NMMA (20 micromol/min x 10 min) on corrected sinus node recovery time (CSNRT), heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, electrocardiographic intervals, and coronary artery blood flow in nine men and 13 women aged 48+/-12 years. All were in sinus rhythm and had normal baseline CSNRTs. Baseline measurements were made during a dextrose infusion, and then L-NMMA was administered, and these parameters remeasured. In 11 patients, the infusions were near the origin of the sinus node artery (Concordant), whereas in the remaining 11, they were into the opposite coronary circulation (Discordant). After L-NMMA, significant prolongations in CSNRT were seen in Concordant (p < 0.001) and Discordant patients (p < 0.05), but were most pronounced in the Concordant group (p < 0.05). Although a significant reduction in coronary artery blood flow and nonsignificant changes in blood pressure and heart rate were observed after L-NMMA, these changes were not related to changes in CSNRT (r2 < or = 0.2; p > or = 0.2). These data support the notion that NO is a modifier of human sinus node automaticity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Exner et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: