Depolarization-induced increases in smooth muscle calcium are transferred to endothelial cells, stimulating NO production that provides negative feedback to curtail vasoconstriction.
May inform rodent vascular tone mechanisms; leaves open relevance to human endothelial-smooth muscle signaling.
Vasoconstriction and increase in the intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) of vascular smooth muscle cells may cause an increase of endothelial cell [Ca(2+)](i), which, in turn, augments nitric oxide (NO) production and inhibits smooth muscle cell contraction. This hypothesis was tested in microperfused rabbit renal afferent arterioles, using fluorescence imaging microscopy with the calcium-sensitive dye fura-2 and the NO-sensitive dye 4-amino-5-methylamino-2',7'-difluorescein. Both dyes were loaded into smooth muscle and endothelium. Depolarization with 100 mmol/l KCl led to a transient vasoconstriction which was converted into a sustained response by N-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME). Depolarization increased smooth muscle cell [Ca(2+)](i) from 162 +/- 15 nmol/l to a peak of 555 +/- 70 nmol/l (n = 7), and this response was inhibited by 80% by the l-type calcium channel blocker calciseptine. After a delay of 10 s, [Ca(2+)](i) increased in endothelial cells immediately adjacent to reactive smooth muscle cells, and this calcium wave spread in a nonregenerative fashion laterally into the endothelial cell layer with a velocity of 1.2 microm/s. Depolarization with 100 mmol/l KCl led to a significant increase in NO production ([NO](i)) which was inhibited by l-NAME (n = 5). Acetylcholine caused a rapid increase in endothelial [Ca(2+)](i), which did not transfer to the smooth muscle cells. l-NAME treatment did not affect changes in smooth muscle [Ca(2+)](i) after depolarization, but it did increase the calcium sensitivity of the contractile apparatus. We conclude that depolarization increases smooth muscle [Ca(2+)](i) which is transferred to the endothelial cells and stimulates NO production which curtails vasoconstriction by reducing the calcium sensitivity of the contractile apparatus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uhrenholt et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: