Why the study?
Does the ACE deletion (DD) genotype increase the degradation of bradykinin compared to the insertion (II) genotype in human subjects?
Does the ACE deletion (DD) genotype increase the degradation of bradykinin compared to the insertion (II) genotype in human subjects?
The ACE deletion allele is associated with enhanced degradation of the vasoprotective peptide bradykinin, providing a potential mechanism for its association with deleterious cardiovascular effects.
ACE DD genotype linked to shorter bradykinin half-life; hypothesis-generating for CV risk mediation and leaves open clinical relevance.
A deletion allele of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene has been associated with increased serum ACE activity, enhanced conversion of angiotensin (Ang) I to Ang II, and cardiovascular morbidity. This study tested the hypothesis that the ACE deletion allele is also associated with enhanced degradation of bradykinin, a vasoprotective peptide. Metabolism of synthetic bradykinin was measured in sera obtained from subjects who were homozygous for either the ACE deletion (n=12) or insertion (n=8) allele and who had participated in an Ang I-infusion protocol. ACE levels tended to be increased in subjects who were DD compared with those who were II [41.2 (95% CI, 27.9, 54.3) vs. 28.0 IU/L (20.0, 35.9); t=-1.6; p=0.1 18]. During Ang I infusion, plasma Ang II concentrations were increased in DD compared with II subjects (F =4.4; p=0.052). In contrast, the half-life of bradykinin was significantly decreased in sera obtained from ACE DD compared with II subjects [26.3 s (17.8, 34.6 s) vs. 42.1 s (24.4, 59.9 s); t=-2.4; p=0.029]. Moreover, there were significant inverse relations between the half-life of bradykinin and serum ACE activity (p < 0.001) and between the half-life of bradykinin and the conversion of Ang I to Ang II (p=0.026). This study confirms that ACE genotype determines bradykinin degradation and suggests another mechanism whereby the ACE D allele could be associated with deleterious cardiovascular effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brown et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: