Why the study?
Do amiloride and its analogues improve postischemic recovery of cardiac contractile function in rat right ventricular walls?
Do amiloride and its analogues improve postischemic recovery of cardiac contractile function in rat right ventricular walls?
Amiloride and its selective Na(+)-H+ exchange blocker analogues protect the rat right ventricular wall from postischemic contractile dysfunction, supporting the role of Na(+)-H+ exchange in ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Amiloride analogues may attenuate postischemic dysfunction in rat ventricle; supports NHE inhibition as target but leaves clinical translation open.
The purpose of the present study was to compare the protective effects of amiloride and three of its derivatives (which are selective inhibitors of Na(+)-H+ exchange) during postischemic reperfusion. Previously, amiloride has been shown to have a protective effect on ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, because of its nonselective actions, the mechanism of its effect is unclear. 5-(N,N-dimethyl)-amiloride (DMA) is also protective and appears to act via inhibition of the Na(+)-H+ exchanger. However, corroborative effects using other selective Na(+)-H+ exchange blockers are needed. Amiloride, DMA, ethylisopropyl amiloride (EIPA), and 5-(N,N-hexamethylene)-amiloride (HMA) were included for 10 min in the reperfusion period after 60 min of global ischemia in the rat right ventricular wall. Peak developed tension and the rates of tension generation and relaxation were significantly improved during reperfusion in the presence of 100 microM amiloride, 10 microM DMA, 2.5 microM HMA, or 1 microM EIPA compared with those of drug-untreated muscles. Contracture formation was significantly depressed in the presence of these drug concentrations as was release of creatine kinase from the ventricular wall into the coronary effluent. The efficacy of these drugs for protecting the right ventricular wall from postischemic contractile dysfunction correlates well with their potency as blockers of Na(+)-H+ exchange. The results provide further evidence in support of a role for Na(+)-H+ exchange. The results provide further evidence in support of a role for Na(+)-H+ exchange in determining ischemia-reperfusion injury in the heart.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meng et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: