Why the study?
The study was conducted to investigate the effects of resistant starch on biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress.
Does resistant starch reduce inflammation and oxidative stress biomarkers in human participants?
Does resistant starch reduce inflammation and oxidative stress biomarkers in human participants?
Resistant starch supplementation may improve systemic inflammation and oxidative stress by reducing TNF-α and IL-6 and increasing total antioxidant capacity.
RS supplementation lowers inflammatory and oxidative stress markers; extends RCT evidence for prebiotic nutrition interventions.
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the effects of resistant starch (RS) on inflammation and oxidative stress related indicators. PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane library were systematically searched to find randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of RS intervention up to February 2020. We used from the effect size, as estimated by the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) to perform the random method meta-analysis, with P value ≦0.05 as statistically significant. The 16 included trials with 17 effect sizes included a total of 739 participants in this paper. The intervention duration was from 2 weeks to 3 months. The analysis indicated that RS decreases the levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF‐α) (SMD = −0.711; 95%CI: −1.227, −0.194; P = 0.007) and interleukin 6 (IL‐6) (SMD = −0.609; 95%CI: −0.924, −0.294; P < 0.001), increases total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (SMD = 2.543, 95% CI: 0.069: 5.017, P = 0.044). No significant effects on C‐reactive protein (CRP) (SMD = −0.583; 95%CI: −1.270, 0.104; P = 0.096), superoxide dismutase (SOD) (SMD = 0.091; 95%CI: −0.156, 0.338; P = 0.471), and malondialdehyde (MDA) (SMD = −0.320; 95%CI: −0.907, 0.266; P = 0.285). Subgroup analysis shown that CRP level significant reduced in subjects from the east (SMD = −1.501; 95%CI: −2.662, −0.340; P = 0.011) or suffering from diseases (SMD: −1.057; 95%CI: −1.999, −0.115; P = 0.028).Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2021.2019284
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: