Why the study?
Does Closed-Loop Stimulation or DDD+ overdrive pacing reduce atrial tachyarrhythmia burden in patients with Brady-Tachy Syndrome compared to conventional DDDR pacing?
Population
149 patients with Brady-Tachy Syndrome, mean age 74+/-9, 72 male, who received a dual chamber pacemaker…
Comparison
Closed-Loop Stimulation or DDD+ overdrive pacing… vs Conventional DDDR pacing algorithm activated at…
Design
RCT, randomized
Follow-up
7 months
Authors
Loading...
CLS pacing may warrant preference to reduce AT burden in brady-tachy syndrome; extends evidence for physiologic algorithms over DDDR/DDD+.
Does Closed-Loop Stimulation or DDD+ overdrive pacing reduce atrial tachyarrhythmia burden in patients with Brady-Tachy Syndrome compared to conventional DDDR pacing?
Closed-Loop Stimulation pacing significantly reduces atrial tachyarrhythmia burden in patients with Brady-Tachy Syndrome compared to conventional DDDR or DDD+ overdrive pacing.
Andrea Puglisi (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: