Why the study?
Does atrial rate-responsive pacing (AAI-R) improve exercise treadmill capacity compared to conventional atrial inhibited pacing (AAI) in patients with sinus node disease and chronotropic incompetence?
Does atrial rate-responsive pacing (AAI-R) improve exercise treadmill capacity compared to conventional atrial inhibited pacing (AAI) in patients with sinus node disease and chronotropic incompetence?
Atrial rate-responsive pacing significantly improves maximum heart rate and exercise duration in patients with sinus node disease and chronotropic incompetence compared to conventional pacing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AAI-R pacing improves exercise capacity in sinus node disease with chronotropic incompetence; supports rate-responsive modes over standard AAI in this population.
Patients with sinus node disease (SND) who are unable to achieve an adequate increase in heart rate during exercise are candidates for atrial rate-responsive pacing (AAI-R). We have implanted 40 AAI-R systems in SND patients with an average follow-up of 12.5 +/- 8 (range 3-30) months. All the patients received an activity-sensing pulse generator (Activitrax, Medtronic or Sensolog, Siemens-Pacesetter) with a single atrial lead. Only patients with an intraoperative AV nodal block cycle-length above 100 beats min-1 were included. During follow-up, one patient was observed to have transient asymptomatic 2:1 AV-block during sleep. No patient developed persistent AV-block or chronic atrial fibrillation. Twelve patients with persistent chronotropic incompetence were assigned for a randomized double-blind crossover study, comparing exercise treadmill capacity in AAI-R with conventional atrial inhibited pacing (AAI). During AAI-R pacing the maximum heart rate during exercise was 120 +/- 1 beats min-1 compared with 97 +/- 21 beats min-1 during AAI pacing (P less than 0.01). The average exercise time increased from 11.2 +/- 2 min during AAI-pacing to 13.4 +/- 3 min during AAI-R pacing (P less than 0.01). AAI pacing should be considered for patients with SND and chronotropic incompetence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosenqvist et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: