Why the study?
Does adriamycin administration induce chronic low output cardiac failure and alter central haemodynamics and regional blood flow in conscious New Zealand White rabbits?
Does adriamycin administration induce chronic low output cardiac failure and alter central haemodynamics and regional blood flow in conscious New Zealand White rabbits?
Adriamycin administration over eight weeks in rabbits produces a reliable experimental model of chronic low output cardiac failure with characteristic haemodynamic and regional blood flow changes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Establishes adriamycin-treated rabbits as a model of chronic low-output failure; leaves open translation to human heart failure research.
Central haemodynamics and regional blood flow were studied comprehensively in conscious New Zealand White rabbits before and during the development of chronic low output cardiac failure produced by administration of the anticancer agent adriamycin. After eight weeks of adriamycin treatment, cardiac index fell from 326(40 to 225(56) ml.min-1.kg-1. This was accompanied by an increase in heart rate and total peripheral resistance but no change in mean systemic blood pressure. Myocardial function was shown to be depressed by the measurement of Frank-Starling curves, the slopes of which were appreciably flatter in adriamycin treated rabbits. Regional blood flow (measured by the radioactive microsphere technique) was redistributed. There were decreases in renal, splenic, small gut, and skeletal muscle blood flow, whereas myocardial and cerebral blood flow were unchanged. There was an increase in total body exchangeable sodium, indicating some salt and water retention. Systemic toxic effects of adriamycin could be limited by treating the animals for eight weeks with adriamycin and then allowing a two week recovery period before haemodynamic study. This would appear to be the optimal dosage schedule.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wanless et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: