Key result
A minimal contact blood pressure measurement method using a body weight-fat scale estimated systolic and diastolic BP with root-mean-square errors of 7.3 ± 2.1 mmHg and 4.5 ± 1.8 mmHg, respectively.
Why the study?
The goal was to develop a minimal contact blood pressure measurement method based on a commercial body weight-fat scale to support daily eHealth monitoring.
Can a minimal contact blood pressure measurement method based on a body weight-fat scale accurately estimate blood pressure compared to a commercial BP monitor?
Observational (n=20)
Can a minimal contact blood pressure measurement method based on a body weight-fat scale accurately estimate blood pressure compared to a commercial BP monitor?
A novel minimal contact blood pressure measurement method using a body weight-fat scale showed moderate accuracy, achieving a C grade on the IEEE standard, suggesting potential for daily eHealth monitoring.
Hypothesis-generating for scale-based BP estimation; requires prospective validation before clinical consideration.
Electronic health (eHealth) is a strategy to improve the physical and mental condition of a human, collecting daily physiological data and information from digital apparatuses. Body weight and blood pressure (BP) are the most popular and important physiological data. The goal of this study is to develop a minimal contact BP measurement method based on a commercial body weight-fat scale, capturing biometrics when users stand on it. The pulse transit time (PTT) is extracted from the ballistocardiogram (BCG) and impedance plethysmogram (IPG), measured by four strain gauges and four footpads of a commercial body weight-fat scale. Cuffless BP measurement using the electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmogram (PPG) serves as the reference method. The BP measured by a commercial BP monitor is considered the ground truth. Twenty subjects participated in this study. By the proposed model, the root-mean-square errors and correlation coefficients (r2s) of estimated systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure are 7.3 ± 2.1 mmHg and 4.5 ± 1.8 mmHg, and 0.570 ± 0.205 and 0.284 ± 0.166, respectively. This accuracy level achieves the C grade of the corresponding IEEE standard. Thus, the proposed method has the potential benefit for eHealth monitoring in daily application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Blood pressure measurement (n=20). Minimal contact BP measurement method based on a body weight-fat scale (BCG and IPG) vs. Commercial BP monitor (ground truth) was evaluated on Accuracy of estimated systolic and diastolic blood pressure (root-mean-square errors). A minimal contact blood pressure measurement method using a body weight-fat scale estimated systolic and diastolic BP with root-mean-square errors of 7.3 ± 2.1 mmHg and 4.5 ± 1.8 mmHg, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: