Key result
A cuffless blood pressure measurement method using a weight scale and toe PPG sensor estimated SBP and DBP with root-mean-square errors of 6.7 ± 1.60 mmHg and 4.8 ± 1.47 mmHg, respectively.
Why the study?
Developing touchless blood pressure measurement offers potential benefits for reducing the risk of COVID-19 infection.
Does a cuffless and touchless BP measurement method using a weight scale and toe PPG accurately estimate blood pressure in human subjects?
Observational (n=20)
Does a cuffless and touchless BP measurement method using a weight scale and toe PPG accurately estimate blood pressure in human subjects?
A novel cuffless and touchless blood pressure measurement method using a weight scale and toe PPG showed reasonable accuracy for estimating systolic and diastolic blood pressure.
May support cuffless BP device development; leaves open clinical adoption pending larger validation studies.
Currently, in terms of reducing the infection risk of the COVID-19 virus spreading all over the world, the development of touchless blood pressure (BP) measurement has potential benefits. The pulse transit time (PTT) has a high relation with BP, which can be measured by electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmogram (PPG). The ballistocardiogram (BCG) reflects the mechanical vibration (or displacement) caused by the heart contraction/relaxation (or heart beating), which can be measured from multiple degrees of the body. The goal of this study is to develop a cuffless and touchless BP-measurement method based on a commercial weight scale combined with a PPG sensor when measuring body weight. The proposed method was that the PTTBCG-PPGT was extracted from the BCG signal measured by a weight scale, and the PPG signal was measured from the PPG probe placed at the toe. Four PTT models were used to estimate BP. The reference method was the PTTECG-PPGF extracted from the ECG signal and PPG signal measured from the PPG probe placed at the finger. The standard BP was measured by an electronic blood pressure monitor. Twenty subjects were recruited in this study. By the proposed method, the root-mean-square error (ERMS) of estimated systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) are 6.7 ± 1.60 mmHg and 4.8 ± 1.47 mmHg, respectively. The correlation coefficients, r2, of the proposed model for the SBP and DBP are 0.606 ± 0.142 and 0.284 ± 0.166, respectively. The results show that the proposed method can serve for cuffless and touchless BP measurement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2022) reported an observational. Cuffless and touchless BP measurement using a weight scale and toe PPG sensor vs. Electronic blood pressure monitor and ECG/finger PPG was evaluated on Root-mean-square error (ERMS) of estimated systolic and diastolic blood pressure. A cuffless blood pressure measurement method using a weight scale and toe PPG sensor estimated SBP and DBP with root-mean-square errors of 6.7 ± 1.60 mmHg and 4.8 ± 1.47 mmHg, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: