Why the study?
Agreement between continuous PAC thermodilution and arterial blood pressure multi-beat waveform analysis for estimating cardiac output after cardiac surgery needed assessment.
Does multi-beat analysis of arterial blood pressure waveforms accurately estimate cardiac output compared to continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution in post-operative cardiac surgery patients?
Does multi-beat analysis of arterial blood pressure waveforms accurately estimate cardiac output compared to continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution in post-operative cardiac surgery patients?
Multi-beat analysis of the arterial pressure waveform shows reasonable agreement and moderate correlation with continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution for cardiac output measurement in post-cardiac surgery patients, including those with arrhythmias.
CO-MBA may offer noninvasive CO monitoring post-cardiac surgery; leaves open accuracy and clinical adoption pending validation studies.
Purpose We sought to assess agreement of cardiac output estimation between continuous pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) guided thermodilution (CO-CTD) and a novel method that performs an analysis of multiple beats of the arterial blood pressure waveform (CO-MBA) in post-operative cardiac surgery patients. Methods PAC obtained CO-CTD measurements were compared with CO-MBA measurements from analysis of arterial blood pressure waveforms using the Argos monitor (Retia Medical; Valhalla, NY, USA), in prospectively enrolled adult cardiac surgical intensive care unit patients. Correlation between paired values of CO-CTD and CO-MBA was computed, and agreement was assessed via Bland-Altman analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed on data segments identified as arrhythmia. Results 927 hours of monitoring data from 79 patients was analyzed, of which 26 had arrhythmia. Mean CO-CTD was 5.29 ± 1.14 L/min (bias ± precision), whereas mean CO-MBA was 5.36 ± 1.33 L/min, (4.95 ± 0.80 L/min and 5.04 ± 1.07 L/min in the arrhythmia subgroup). Mean of differences was 0.04 ± 1.04 L/min, 95% limits of agreement: -2.00 to 2.08 L/min, and a percentage error of 38.2%. In the arrhythmia subgroup, mean of differences was 0.14 ± 0.90 L/min, 95% limits of agreement: -1.63 to 1.91 L/min and percentage error of 35.4%. Paired observations showed a moderate correlation throughout the cohort (r = 0.64). Conclusion CO measurements using a novel multi-beat analysis of the arterial pressure waveform are reasonably correlated with traditional more-invasive continuous PAC thermodilution guided cardiac output measurements in adult patients after cardiac surgery including in those with arrythmias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khanna et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: