Why the study?
The agreement between continuous PAC-guided thermodilution and a novel multi-beat arterial waveform analysis method for estimating cardiac output in postoperative cardiac surgery patients needed to be assessed.
Does cardiac output estimation by multi-beat analysis agree with continuous thermodilution in post-operative cardiac surgery patients?
Does cardiac output estimation by multi-beat analysis agree with continuous thermodilution in post-operative cardiac surgery patients?
Cardiac output estimated by multi-beat analysis of arterial waveforms is not interchangeable with continuous thermodilution in post-cardiac surgery patients, though it may meet criteria for clinical acceptance of minimally invasive monitoring.
CO-MBA not interchangeable with continuous PAC thermodilution; leaves open utility of less invasive monitoring in post-cardiac surgery ICU patients.
We sought to assess agreement of cardiac output estimation between continuous pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) guided thermodilution (CO-CTD) and a novel pulse wave analysis (PWA) method that performs an analysis of multiple beats of the arterial blood pressure waveform (CO-MBA) in post-operative cardiac surgery patients. PAC obtained CO-CTD measurements were compared with CO-MBA measurements from the Argos monitor (Retia Medical; Valhalla, NY, USA), in prospectively enrolled adult cardiac surgical intensive care unit patients. Agreement was assessed via Bland-Altman analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed on data segments identified as arrhythmia, or with low CO (less than 5 L/min). 927 hours of monitoring data from 79 patients was analyzed, of which 26 had arrhythmia. Mean CO-CTD was 5.29 ± 1.14 L/min (bias ± precision), whereas mean CO-MBA was 5.36 ± 1.33 L/min, (4.95 ± 0.80 L/min and 5.04 ± 1.07 L/min in the arrhythmia subgroup). Mean of differences was 0.04 ± 1.04 L/min with an error of 38.2%. In the arrhythmia subgroup, mean of differences was 0.14 ± 0.90 L/min with an error of 35.4%. In the low CO subgroup, mean of differences was 0.26 ± 0.89 L/min with an error of 40.4%. In adult patients after cardiac surgery, including those with low cardiac output and arrhythmia CO-MBA is not interchangeable with the continuous thermodilution method via a PAC, when using a 30% error threshold.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khanna et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: