Why the study?
Cardiac output can be minimally invasively estimated by pulse wave analysis, but multi-beat analysis needed comparison against intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in ICU patients after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
Does cardiac output estimation by multi-beat analysis of the radial arterial blood pressure waveform agree with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in adult patients in the ICU after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery?
Does cardiac output estimation by multi-beat analysis of the radial arterial blood pressure waveform agree with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in adult patients in the ICU after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery?
Multi-beat analysis of the radial arterial blood pressure waveform provides reasonable agreement with pulmonary artery thermodilution for estimating cardiac output in post-cardiac surgery ICU patients.
Multi-beat analysis shows promise for CO monitoring post-OPCAB; leaves open routine replacement of PATD pending larger validation studies.
Cardiac output (CO) is a key hemodynamic variable that can be minimally invasively estimated by pulse wave analysis. Multi-beat analysis is a novel pulse wave analysis method. In this prospective observational clinical method comparison study, we compared CO estimations by multi-beat analysis with CO measured by intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution (PATD) in adult patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB). We included patients after planned admission to the ICU after elective OPCAB who were monitored with a radial arterial catheter and a pulmonary artery catheter. At seven time points, we determined CO using intermittent PATD (PATD-CO; reference method) and simultaneously recorded the radial arterial blood pressure waveform that we later used to estimate CO using multi-beat analysis (MBA-CO; test method) with the Argos monitor (Retia Medical; Valhalla, NY, USA). Blood pressure waveforms impaired by inappropriate damping properties or artifacts were excluded. We compared PATD-CO and MBA-CO using Bland-Altman analysis accounting for repeated measurements, the percentage error, and the concordance rate derived from four-quadrant plot analysis (15% exclusion zone). We analyzed 167 CO values of 31 patients. Mean PATD-CO was 5.30 ± 1.22 L/min and mean MBA-CO was 5.55 ± 1.82 L/min. The mean of the differences between PATD-CO and MBA-CO was 0.08 ± 1.10 L/min (95% limits of agreement: - 2.13 L/min to + 2.29 L/min). The percentage error was 40.7%. The four-quadrant plot-derived concordance rate was 88%. CO estimation by multi-beat analysis of the radial arterial blood pressure waveform (Argos monitor) shows reasonable agreement compared with CO measured by intermittent PATD in adult patients treated in the ICU after OPCAB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greiwe et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: