Why the study?
The mechanisms underlying the anti-proteinuric activity of AT 2 R, particularly whether they are independent of its anti-hypertensive and anti-inflammatory effects, remain unknown.
Does AT2R agonist C21 prevent proteinuria and megalin loss in high salt-fed obese Zucker rats?
Does AT2R agonist C21 prevent proteinuria and megalin loss in high salt-fed obese Zucker rats?
AT2R activation with C21 prevents high salt-induced proteinuria in obese rats by restoring megalin surface expression via the Akt/GSK-3β pathway, independent of blood pressure changes.
Proteinuria is a risk factor for and consequence of kidney injury. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor (AT 2 R) is an emerging reno-protective target and is anti-proteinuric under pathological conditions, including high salt-fed obese animals. However, the mechanisms remain unknown, particularly whether the anti-proteinuric activity of AT 2 R is independent of its anti-hypertensive and anti-inflammatory effects. In the present study, obese Zucker rats were fed high sodium (4%) diet (HSD) for 48 hours, a time in which blood pressure does not change. HSD caused proteinuria without affecting glomerular slit diaphragm proteins (nephrin and podocin), glomerular filtration rate and inflammatory (TNFα, IL-6, and TGF-β), ruling out glomerular injury and inflammation but indicating tubular mechanisms of proteinuria. At cellular and molecular levels, we observed a glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)-3β-mediated megalin phosphorylation, and its subsequent endocytosis and lysosomal degradation in HSD-fed rat kidneys. Megalin is a major proximal tubular endocytic protein transporter. The AT 2 R agonist C21 (0.3 mg/kg/day, i.p.) administration prevented proteinuria and rescued megalin surface expression potentially by activating Akt-mediated phosphorylation and inactivation of GSK-3β in HSD-fed rat kidneys. Overall, AT 2 R has a direct anti-proteinuric activity, potentially via megalin regulation, and is suggested as a novel target to limit kidney injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kulkarni et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: