Why the study?
Does MRI differ from 3DUS in quantifying carotid atherosclerosis vessel wall volume?
Does MRI differ from 3DUS in quantifying carotid atherosclerosis vessel wall volume?
MRI and 3DUS yield significantly different measurements of carotid vessel wall volume, partly due to MR flow artifacts in the common carotid artery.
Clinicians should not interchange MRI and 3DUS vessel wall volumes; cross-sectional data leaves open which modality better quantifies carotid atherosclerosis.
PURPOSE: To evaluate differences in carotid atherosclerosis measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten subject volunteers underwent carotid 3DUS and MRI (multislice black blood fast spin echo, T1-weighted contrast, double inversion recovery, 0.5 mm in-plane resolution, 2 mm slice, 3.0 T) within 1 hour. 3DUS and MR images were manually segmented by two observers providing vessel wall and lumen contours for quantification of vessel wall volume (VWV) and generation of carotid thickness maps. RESULTS: MRI VWV (1040 +/- 210 mm(3)) and 3DUS VWV (540 +/- 110 mm(3)) were significantly different (P < 0.0001). When normalized for the estimated adventitia volume, mean MRI VWV decreased 240 +/- 50 mm(3) and was significantly different from 3DUS VWV (P < 0.001). Two-dimensional carotid maps showed qualitative evidence of regional differences in the plaque and vessel wall thickness between MR and 3DUS in all subjects. Power Doppler US confirmed that heterogeneity in the common carotid artery in all patients resulted from apparent flow disturbances, not atherosclerotic plaque. CONCLUSION: MRI and 3DUS VWV were significantly different and carotid maps showed homogeneous thickness differences and heterogeneity in specific regions of interest identified as MR flow artifacts in the common carotid artery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krasinski et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: