Why the study?
Does chronic pressure or volume overload alter left ventricular systolic and diastolic performance compared to normal subjects?
Does chronic pressure or volume overload alter left ventricular systolic and diastolic performance compared to normal subjects?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Left ventricular geometric and functional adaptations differ significantly depending on whether the chronic overload is due to pressure (hypertension) or volume (aortic regurgitation).
Summary: The present study was aimed at evaluation of changes in systolic and diastolic left ventricular function during chronic pressure of volume overload, in comparison with normal subjects. Sixty-two patients were included: group 1 was composed of 25 normal subjects, group 2 was composed of 20 subjects with essential hypertension, and group 3 was composed of 17 subjects with aortic regurgitation without congestive heart failure. Cardiac output, aortic and left ventricular pressures (micromanometers), ventricular volume and ascending aortic radius (cineangiography), ejection fraction (EF), mean velocity of fiber shortening (VCF), ventricular mass (m), and the ratio m/EDV (EDV, end diastolic volume) were determined. Also measured were maxima for end systolic pressure (ESP), end systolic stress (ESS), and end systolic volume (ESV) and radius (ESR), as well as the modulus of left ventricular chamber and muscle stiffness (method of Gaash et al.) (1) and characteristic impedance of the ascending aorta (Zc). In hypertensive patients, m and m/EDV were increased, as was the ESP/ESV ration, whereas EF and VCF were not modified and the ESS/ESR was normal or sometimes decreased. The systolic “pump” function thus appeared to be increased, whereas the muscle function appeared normal or decreased. The moduli of left ventricular chamber stiffness and muscle stiffness were increased. Zc was increased because of ?? greater pulse wave velocity, although aortic radius wa?? larger. A close relationship was found between Zc an?? the ratio m/EDV. In patients with aortic regurgitation, th?? increased left ventricular mass was closely related to th?? regurgitant fraction (RF). The m/EDV ratio was norma?? EF was unmodified and VCF and the ESP/ESV rati?? were decreased. The ESS/ESR ratio was decreased an?? in some cases was normal. These results suggest that th?? “pump” function was depressed, whereas the “muscle” function could remain normal. Left ventricular chambe?? stiffness was decreased, whereas muscle stiffness wa?? normal. Zc was diminished in relation to a larger aorti?? radius, whereas pulse wave velocity was normal. There was no relationship between Zc and the ratio m/EDV. We?? conclude that: (a) m is increased in both pressure o?? volume overload; (b) the changes in left ventricular g?? ometry depend on the overload (pressure or volume) an?? Zc appears to be a good index of arterial factors of pres?? sure overload in hypertensive patients; and (c) the?? changes in systolic and diastolic function of the left ven?? tricle depend not only on the properties of left ventricula?? muscle but on geometry as well.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Merillon et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: