Why the study?
Does the presence of intraventricular conduction blocks predict progression to high-grade A-V block and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Population
480 patients with acute myocardial infarction
Comparison
Presence of intraventricular conduction blocks vs No evidence of intraventricular conduction…
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
May support selective pacing consideration only with concomitant 1° AV block in AMI; leaves open routine prophylactic benefit.
Does the presence of intraventricular conduction blocks predict progression to high-grade A-V block and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
The presence of intraventricular conduction blocks in acute myocardial infarction implies a poor prognosis but does not justify prophylactic temporary pacing unless associated with first-degree A-V block.
Scheinman et al. (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: