Why the study?
Hemodynamics of the functionally univentricular heart is an important research topic, and the study aimed to compare intraventricular flow between single right ventricle patients and healthy left hearts using patient-specific CFD simulations.
Do intraventricular flow characteristics differ between single right ventricle patients and healthy left ventricle subjects?
Do intraventricular flow characteristics differ between single right ventricle patients and healthy left ventricle subjects?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Intraventricular flow simulations reveal that single right ventricles have significantly deteriorated washout and lower vortex formation compared to healthy left ventricles, providing functional insights beyond standard ejection fraction.
PURPOSE: Patients with a functionally univentricular heart represent one of the most common severe cardiac lesions with a prevalence of 3 per 10,000 live births. Hemodynamics of the singular ventricle is a major research topic in cardiology and there exists a relationship between fluid dynamical features and cardiac behavior in health and disease. The aim of the present work was to compare intraventricular flow in single right ventricle (SRV) patients and subjects with healthy left hearts (LV) through patient-specific CFD simulations. METHODS: Three-dimensional real-time echocardiographic images were obtained for five SRV patients and two healthy subjects and CFD simulations with a moving mesh methodology were performed. Intraventricular vortex formation and vortex formation time (VFT) as well as the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) and ventricular washout were evaluated. RESULTS: The results show significantly lower values for the VFT and the TKE in SRV patients compared with healthy LV subjects. Furthermore, vortex formation does not progress to the apex in SRV patients. These findings were confirmed by a significantly lower washout in SRV patients. CONCLUSIONS: The study pinpoints the intriguing role of intraventricular flows to characterize performance of SRVs that goes beyond standard clinical metrics such as ejection fraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grünwald et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: